Tag Archives: jeff koons

Making a monster-sized Chia Pet and passing it off as “art”


Is Jeff Koons’s Puppy more than just an over-blown Chia-Pet? One of the cheap tricks being used to make “art” these days is to make a much larger (or smaller) version of the object being sculpted (e.g. Ron Mueck’s wax museum style human figures). Considering that it costs over $70,000 each year just to water and maintain Koons’s version, which do you prefer, the original Chia-Pet or Koons’s monster-size version?

Check out this link for more…
http://flavorwire.com/54578/clearing-the-air-about-public-art

20140628-225341-82421173.jpg

20140628-225341-82421024.jpg

$58 million for a balloon animal?! Eh?


The most expensive piece of “art” ever sold by a living artist is metallic Balloon Dog (orange) by Jeff Koons of NYC (sold by Christies Nov 2013).

“Art is art. Everything else is everything else”. — Ad Reinhardt

IMO this qualifies as everything else…Hype Hype Hype EE 965. Puzzling EE 467. Banal EE 56734.

20140511-205008.jpg

The rising tide of Charm-bracelet art? Jeff Koons’s Puppy versus Serra’s Tilted Arc


Please don’t walk on the sculptures…

Artinpublicplaces's Blog

In order to be acceptable to the public at large, do large artworks intended for public space have to meet some basic criteria?  I stumbled across an interesting old 2009 article online that discussed public reactions to several large artworks that have been staged outdoors in NYC during the last several decades.

http://www.flavorwire.com/54578/clearing-the-air-about-public-art

One NYC art critic thought that all public artworks should be “crowd-pleasing”, which seems to favor those works that are cute and representational, rather that abstract.  Low art versus high(brow) art?  IMO this is a problem.  Good art is not decoration — it should challenge viewers to think, or at least to stop and ponder a bit.  IMO the recent trend towards large oversized animals as cutsie sculpture (Koons’s Puppy, Louise Bourgeois’s giant spiders, or even Roxy Paine’s metal trees) is almost as bad as clogging up outdoor parks with sculptures of dead soldiers on horseback.  These romantic…

View original post 46 more words

The rising tide of Charm-bracelet art? Jeff Koons’s Puppy versus Serra’s Tilted Arc


In order to be acceptable to the public at large, do large artworks intended for public space have to meet some basic criteria?  I stumbled across an interesting old 2009 article online that discussed public reactions to several large artworks that have been staged outdoors in NYC during the last several decades.

http://www.flavorwire.com/54578/clearing-the-air-about-public-art

One NYC art critic thought that all public artworks should be “crowd-pleasing”, which seems to favor those works that are cute and representational, rather that abstract.  Low art versus high(brow) art?  IMO this is a problem.  Good art is not decoration — it should challenge viewers to think, or at least to stop and ponder a bit.  IMO the recent trend towards large oversized animals as cutsie sculpture (Koons’s Puppy, Louise Bourgeois’s giant spiders, or even Roxy Paine’s metal trees) is almost as bad as clogging up outdoor parks with sculptures of dead soldiers on horseback.  These romantic charm-bracelet artworks like Koons’s Puppy take up valuable space and public funds that could and should be going to develop more challenging artworks, that — like the Eiffel Tower — will not necessarily be greeted with open arms by the public when they are first introduced.